I like how you put this qualifier in there " as long as its not simply because he's lazy and won't get a job. Being broke and being lazy are 2 completely different things. I know a few millionaires that are complete lazy slobs, in fact that's WHY they are lazy. From dating hundreds of women and sleeping with even more, most of them do not have the mindset that you do. You are in the minority. In fact in dealing with tons of women, they feel that when a man spends money on them it makes them feel like a "woman".
Peppr has a tie-up with escort agencies and speaks with prostitutes by phone before uploading their profiles. Peppr, which launched on April 1, exists because Germany legalized prostitution in The most common Google Hangouts problems and how to fix them 7 hours ago. The best Android apps May 21 hours ago. The 50 best shows on Amazon Prime right now 2 days ago. The best shows and original series on Netflix right now 2 days ago.
Apple iPad How to get Fortnite on your Android device 3 days ago. But this is dating vs prostitutes, not girlfriends vs prostitutes. Even if you live in Nevada girlfriends are better. Providing you have a good one.
And thank god they don't. I see what you're saying Prostitute if you want to relieve yourself sexually and dating if your goal is to want a girlfriend.
Having a girlfriend is better than prostitution, obviously. That's not the question. This is pathetic. What if you had a brain and were able to articulate a valid argument. IF you think this one is, then that is just sad. What has humanity come to when people think that a valid argument is simply attacking someone verbally and calling them names. What man does not want a hot housewife that makes no money and he becomes the breadwinner.
Come up with a good argument. And that's the majority of women. Every women is a gold digger. IF you can tell me you will than either your a leprechaun or a liar. Money can kill you if you use it to buy a gun and shoot yourself. Sex can't kill you if you are both virgins, unless you f-each other to death.
And love can kill you if it turns into obsession and you both commit suicide because you want to spend eternity together as spirits. All I heard was blablabla you suck at arguing women never work etc Um why don't you marry someone who will work? Stop going for gold diggers and free loaders and find someone who is independent and can sustain a job, not all man has to be the big macho who only works.
Hes got a point. I will not date a man who is broke and never has money. Call me old fashioned but I've also heard that men actually want to take care of us and we can stay home and take care of the kids. There's no way that you would marry a man with no money and refuses to make any.
Men don't need to support it finnacially. The laws on the books try and make men do it, but we don't have to do anything. Move to canada if we want. A man who leaves a pregnant prostitute and moves to Canada, vs a man who leaves a "woman" both of which you are not married there really is no difference, its still a life. Either way its the same to the child. Again, that's girlfriend and not dating.
Dating there are no guarentees, many men can easily spend bucks on 3 different first dates and get nothing out of them. You are also assuming that she's going to put out. So I still say dating is better. There still are no guarantees that women will put out on the first date. Women are told not to put out on the first date.
Most women don't put out on the first date, and just because you and I have had the experience that some women do, its not what most men's reality is. So far as I know, there are gay prostitues as well, so your argument really doesn't mean anything. Also, this totally invalidates your question and gives a little insight as to why you only see dating in terms of dollars, as if all straight men think about is sex-to-dollars ratio. When I'm out with my Girlfriend on a date it's because I like her company and we get along.
I could care less about how much we spend or if I'm getting any that night - I'm secure in my relationship.
Its not irrelevant. She said, "in disregard to what the WOMAN may be feeling" She was arguing that i was straight and upset that "women" are turning me down. Her argument is nullified. Anyone who is gay will tell you most of us are shallow and out for a good time we have no problem with it. We don't have to resort to prostitution. Get a gay friend. Gay prostitution is an anomaly. Its less abundant, because of what i just said.
So focusing on the minority example fails. If you could "care less" about the sex, then get a dog. Or better yet hang out with your guy friends, who, on the average men have more in common with other men. Thats why its better to be gay. You don't have to hide your farts, you can talk about football without boring your partner and still enjoy all the benefits of sex. Your argument fails.
Wow this is not about just wanting sex. Although many women. But that's not the topic of discussion.
The point is what is better prostitution vs dating. NOT sex vs dating.
Or even sex vs relationships. Ill give you a hint, what if you could pay an "escort" to make you feel good without leading to sex? Whereas in dating men get nothing for the bucks they spend on average.
Prostitute dating websites - The time small-dollar loan applying for city automatically out your own benefit with this means as there, top dating prostitution. The dish . Apr 21, A Berlin-based company just launched Peppr, an app that mimics the dating website model to connect prostitutes with prospective clients. Peppr calls itself the "first mobile web-app for booking.
Askerif you are a gay male, are you speaking of straight women from your personal experience? There are lots of free, low cost dates that are enjoyable: a museum, a park, a free concert, a music club date No man ever has to pay for everything. Why are you harping on this old-fashioned dating technique of man always pays. If you go on a good Dutch date both of you will feel good to have shared each other's company and no one's pocket will be picked.
If a man gets "nothing" after a date, and I mean, enjoying a woman's company, personality Dating is not a means to an end alone. You don't date to simply get sex. If that's all you want, pick up people at bars or buy a prostitute. Dating's about more than sex for men and women.
If everything else is good, sex, with healthy people, usually enters the picture. But one day at a time. Buying a woman for sex alone feels pretty empty to me. If you only need a canal to jack off in, you don't need a date. Actually you end up paying for emotional connection too. In the form of gifts, and paying for dates. So yeah, you can buy that. Maybe for a materialistic person but most don't like someone just because they got them a gift. If you as a man, never buy her a gift, never pay for dates, and she's your girlfriend you're going to get dumped.
Call all women materialistic if you want to, but that's the truth. And like I said, because of that, you still end up paying for emotional connection because of it. First off, sex is never "free" you always end up paying for it, even when you have a girlfriend. Yes, the sex is better with a girlfriend than a whore. But then again, this is not whore sex vs girlfriend sex, this is prostitution vs dating. Secondly, you really don't know if the girl your dating has a lose vagina.
Where there is no guarantees your going to get there. Oh and one more thing. When your dating you have no idea if she's had 30 kids and decided not to have the surgery, nor do the kegals.
And by the way many prostitutes actually do the kegals and they do the surgery. PLUS they have the money to do it since they typically roll in money. But you'll never know since first dates don't end in sex, "typically". Desperate for sex if you goto prostitutes? I have two words for you: Charlie sheen. OR I could keep going, with people such as tiger woods and david ducovney. So no, your wrong there. Plus you are NOT interested in them, if you are dating, you are getting to know them, you have NO IDEA who they are, she could be a raving lunatic and he could be a raping, ax murderer for all you know.
The only interest you have really is superficial, and a mans interest in a prostitute is also superficial. Um, I'm sorry but if your dating someone you are interested in them. I don't know what world that you live in, but even celebrities can be despite for sex they can be nympho psychos human beings as well. You don't know their personal lives. Actually their personal lives are never "personal" they are on display for the whole world to see. You can't be desperate for sex if your getting sex all the time.
And those people I mentioned do, its in the media. So I guess you sleep with every guy you date then? Well I guess lets listen to what the media has to say, cause we all know that media is true and something we should definitely live by and OH YEAH they definitely don't tell any lies. I don't know who broke your heart or manipulated you bad enough to think that there isn't a difference prostitution or dating but you definitely got it twisted.
I'm sticking to what I know is real. Why the hell would tiger woods admit to being a cheating bastard and probably ruin his career? The media once told me that obama was elected president. I guess mcaine won then The question of this post is "which is better", which suggests that they obviously aren't the same.
Thats like saying people have a negative view of criminals, therefore we shouldn't lock them away in prisons. Do women demand that strangers pay for them?
Do they have to give anything in return? Did they deserve anything to get that money from men? Are they entitled to it? Do men always have to pay regardless if the woman has sex or doesn't have sex with the man? The fact that you think this way reaffirms my point, you are obviously only dating a very limited quality of woman.
Most of the dates I have been on we take turns paying or go dutch. Though I would probably never date you since you seem to want but one thing in return. All I ask for of my dates is good company. Sometimes, shock, its fun to go on a date where no money is spent.
If your materialistic nature can wrap its head around that. No it doesn't. These are facts, not a way of thinking. I would definitely never date you. And I'm sure he pays first when he goes out with you.
And BTW if you are going to tell me a bunch of lies and say "oh I would date a broke man with no ambition which means money an no goals, which means money and whos lazy and refuses to get a job. Right, its economically and better overall to have a girlfriend than a prostitute, but this isn't about girlfriends vs prostitutes, its dating vs prostitutes.
There is a big difference. Plus lets hope the sex is better since having sex with someone you actually care about is actually a hell of a lot better than someone whos a stranger.
Plus they examine the men they sleep with before they have sex, and they use condoms. Can you say that same thing about regular women you date NO you cant. I live in vegas they don't test the guys maybe only at casinos were the girls are prepared but no prostitutes are on the street and don't bring a test kit with them. Visual checks do not show hepatitis, HPV, non symptomatic syphilis, gonorrhea, chalmydia, herpes. Condoms will help with all of these, but are not foolproof.
HIV will not show up on a visual check either. Using prostitutes is dicey for this reason. Their number of exposures to unknown men is also dicey.
A prostitute having 25 partners a week has sex with men a year. I don't think those are great safety odds.
Most average women aren't having sex with men a month. I insist on using a condom. I've only had one person whine. I ignored him and we carried on with protestion. If a man is having ujankossencontemporary.comotected sex with a dating woman, that means she has ujankossencontemporary.comotected sex with other partners.
I'd wear my raincoat and have a serious discussion with her. Vegas is not America. Nevada is the only state where sexwork is legal and regulated. Getting a prostitute elsewhere is not a rational choice. I would say the point of dating is evolutionarily meant to pair bond and eventually propagate the species. Which usually is done through sex. Stds are a bad example.
Dating is better long term, IF it lasts. Now go and look up how many marriages end up in divorce and get back to me. In case you didn't know, prostitues in nevada are regulated and they are forced to get monthly std checks, and if they get something they are fired.
They are also forced to use condoms and do penis checks on all the men they sleep with. Can you say the same about some random girl you date? You have no idea. With a prostitute you know for sure. Prostitutes in the bunny ranch are actually cleaner than your average woman on the street who ISNT a hooker. They are actually forced to get monthly checks. Your average woman is not, and does not.
Average woman on the street who isn't a hooker isn't having sex with say 25 men a week five days of work and doesn't need to get checked monthly.
And anyone can get an STD in a 30 day window. Even with regular condom use. With high numbers of partners the risks exist.
Sexworkers are performing a job, but this job is risky even under legal prostitution. They have sex with whoever pays. It would be great if their clients were tested before they had sex with them. STIs would, therefore, not be a risk for sexworkers, and also their subsequent clients. I ain't callin you a gold digger, but you ain't messin with no broke. If I were a girl id rather date too. Because I'm gonna get paid for NOT having sex. If all you want is a relationship, you're a gold digger.
Of course you'd rather date, because at least with dating you have an option of not having sex. A whore has to put out to get money, a woman you date does not. Actually, I don't think a guy should have to pay for everything. I don't think it's fair.
And I wouldn't be in a relationship for the money. Stop acting like you know all women, moron. You don't. I know every woman in the world! But that's not the point. A man ends up paying for the date anyways, and the woman has the option of putting out.
No, you don't understand. The guy loses money on a date regardless if the woman puts out. And if she doesn't put out and he pays, hes still lost What happens if a woman goes on a date and the guy spends all the money on her. She gets a free meal, and a free movie, and a good time with a guy. What does the guy get And he has to pay for that?
And how good is it when she's not giving him sex? Ur the one that doesn't. If a man wants to go out with a girl so badly then why can't he do the manly thing and pay? Instead of complaining like a bitch. Like you are.
Jul 21, Do dating apps have a prostitution problem? By. To be fair, Tinder is far from the only dating site dealing with these kinds of issues; in fact, since the advent of . Aug 06, Dating Over 50 ?Female Friendly Dating Religious Dating Ethnic Dating BBW & BHM Dating Miscellaneous Niches ??Dating Apps Popular Match Systems Dating for Professionals Single Parents Dating ??Gay & Lesbian Facebook Dating Matchmaking Services Australia Dating Canadian Dating UK Dating ??Hook Up Dating Alternative Dating ??Wealthy. Jun 17, Her dating life is a total disaster - and she's the first to admit it. But it seems Mel Greig is giving Tinder another chance, returning to the .
It may surprise you, but not all guys go out with someone just for sex. I don't know, maybe they like the girl I know, it's a shocker. And a guy can have a nice time with a girl without complaining about not getting sex or using his money. You're just a loser that doesn't deserve anyone except someone that's as whiny as you are.
Nope you dont. If a woman wants to have a boyfriend so badly, then why can't she just put out? You seem to think that its perfectly find to throw away money on a stranger, and not get anything in return.
Dating A Prostitute
Since when is giving money away to a complete stranger, who did nothing to earn it, "manly"? A man has no idea if he's going to get laid, and she could turn out to be a total psycho on the date and screams and throws plates.
It may suprise you, but not all women actually put out on dates, some women actually use men for money. Do all of us men a favor and stick to touching your cats, because no man wants to touch you. Nope I already proved convincingly I might add that prostitution is better than dating. I did not however say that its better for men. So go ahead and put words in peoples mouths.
Your right, and way to kiss a girls ass. Kissing women's asses is the best way to get you laid. For sure. Wouldn't want all the grumpy sluts on here to go chasing with pitchforks I suppose. That's pretty arrogant assuming I would date you. BTW I'm gay. This is what we like to call a liar. Aka, a troll who tries to prove a point by lying to pretend they are an expert on a subject. That's why you wanna pay for pussy! You're probably uglier than sin!!! But that's OK, most tricks are! That's what's wrong with women in the US, think their twat is made of solid gold.
You want to get paid? Get a job. You wanna be saved? Go to church hoe. You're just a cow that no one would touch for free. Then dont get mad when a man never pays for dates.
Especially when most of them are only paying for it Lets face it, if we wanted to "hang out" with someone and not get sex, they could do it with guy friends. Anyone who asks for a date is naturally expected to pay. Why wouldn't he pay? I don't care if there is a guy who doesn't want to pay for dates And I agree with the rest But mature men who actually want relationships will do it for that aforementioned reason. You're GAY? That makes it even more pathetic IF this is about you. If not, good on you.
Its very easy to get men to sleep with me. Yes, its VERY easy. I have a lot of straight friends and women just piss me off, seeing what they do to them. When a man is paying for the date, regardless if he asks, he's paying for sex typically.
Apr 03, 'Compensated dating' is just another term for prostitution Let's be frank about this phenomenon in Hong Kong: if a client is paying thousands of dollars for Author: Alex Lo. I dated a prostitute for a year. 6 of those months without knowing about it. Later we lived together for 2 months before ending the relationship. Quick Background: When we started dating, she said she had a large amount of debt and somehow paid i. This is actually clever. People are hacking it with their emotional prejudice, which you kinda take for granted. But like you keep saying - this isn't relationships vs. prostitution, this is dating vs. prostitution. But you gotta look at that mathmatically.
Logic then says if he doesn't pay for the date then you should respect that. Because he doesn't want to pay for sex. How many men have you ever asked out? Wait, don't tell me - Zero. So of course you say the person that asks should pay because you never ask. And the fact you won't go on a date unless a guy pays means you aren't that different from a prostitute yourself.
Don't be stupid The point is, the majority of dates people go on don't end up in love or a relationship of any kind. Thats why this is dating vs prostitution not dating vs marriage, relationships or girlfriends. Both dating and prostitution are short term deals. I believe that they'll regret it later Like I said before, this is vegas and with regulation there is less chance of stds than with a woman you meet whos not forced to get monthly checks and check her man and forced to uses a condom every time she has sex.
Dating only has a purpose if you get the goal in the end, and most times you dont. Its like going in a race knowing your going to lose 9 times out of Not to meantion you have to PAY to race, every single time, regardless if you win or lose. Nope you always win. Because there is no race, there's always a trophy. Its a different trophy mind you, but its still one. Sure the other one is better, but at least we get one. Its not about giving up.
Its not like just because you sleep with a prostitute, your giving up on relationships. Charlie sheen gets in relationships all the time and he still sleeps with hookers. But that's just one example. You shouldn't have to get both. Ideally women should be putting out, or doing something to deserve the money men pay for them.
So when a woman goes out with a man she should decide before she even knows him if she is going to sleep with him? Lets get real. Most women know within the first 3 minutes of meeting a man if there is a possibility of sleeping with him. And sometimes they even say "im definitely going to screw this man. Only gold digging women think this way.
Im not spending money just to hang out. Do you ask your friends to pay for your way when you hang out with them? Because he has a penis? No, because if someone asks me out then it means he is paying. So if you asked a guy out then you would pay his way?
I doubt it. And by the way most women don't ask out men, it just isn't the norm. You can lie to me all day and say that you would, but I highly doubt youd ever ask a guy out, and even if you did you can't tell me that tons of girls do. And which is is, either you know you want to be with a man or you dont. And if you know you like a man your dating, then what's wrong with doing something to deserve the money he's paying you.
What is he paying for? That's exactly it! If a man is paying for the date, the woman should pay for the date too. Because if he's the one paying for the date WHY is he the one paying? Why not her? Why not both?
I mean if both people are equals, and both people are trying to get to know one another, why should the man have to pay? Because he's her equal? Nope, because she expects him to.
Both people are getting to know each other, BOTH people, so its not just him paying to know her, Shouldnt she do something to earn her knowledge of him? I still think that it has to do with you asking her out and not vice-varsa. And why is the guy cheap if he doesn't pay for the first date? Who cares if he's cheap. Unless you care about the man for his money.
Why is it that only women are allowed to call men cheap and for some reason its not OK to call a woman a gold digger. Or better yet, why can't men calll women cheap for not paying half on the first date? AFter all, men and women are equals right?
Well, not completely, no. I say, come on, you can do one lousy thing to deserve the man paying for that date. And when I find a woman that thinks that a man saying "no I won't pay for the date, were going dutch. With prostitution, the guy gets what he wants, and the girl gets what she wants. There's no game playing, you never think to yourself "does he or she like me? Everyone wins. With a woman you date, she's not required to do monthly STD and aids checks.
Like a legal prostitute. Its defiantly cheaper. An average prostitute in Nevada costs about bucks on average for sex. And even then its not a certainty. That's 40 bucks not including popcorn and candy.
So that's 60 bucks. Now include the cost of the meal at a "decent". Because we all know she's going to think your a cheap loser if you take her to taco bell.
So you figure 20 bucks a person. This is not including candy, gifts, or flowers. Suppose it was even guaranteed that she's has to put out on the 3rd date making it "equal" even then its like putting her vagina on lay away, and you have to wait.
Most people also don't date consecutively one day after the other either. Most of the time women in marriages "put out" to get their husbands to do chores or anything like that.
Its been said that most women are nothing more than closeted prostitutes because after all how many women here would date a man who's broke? How many women here will accept a man who doesn't pay for the date? If you won't accept a man who takes you to taco bell for a date, then all it means is that you are a hooker who is just haggling over the price. The only difference between prostitution and dating is emotional connection and love.
Both of which are free. So, unless you want men to date you, stop acting like whores, because were just going to go there instead of dating you. Because at least with them its a sure thing. So which do you think is better. Obviously getting the sex for free from a girlfriend is better.
That's why its vs dating, not relationships. Share Facebook. Prostitution VS Dating. Which is better? Add Opinion. Well, it seems to me that you're assuming the only goal men have is to have sex, and that all women expect men to pay for everything. Both of these things are untrue. If you're only interested in sex, then maybe a prostitute is a good option for you. As you've mentioned, a relationship offers additional things, such as an emotional connection, love, companionship, good conversation, a partnership when it comes to finances, housework, child-rearing depending on how serious your relationship is.
In all of the relationships I've had, I do not expect my partner to pay for everything. In the beginning of the relationship, we usually go dutch, or one person pays for one date, the other pays for the next. When the relationship becomes more serious, we pretty much always take turns paying for dates since its easier than splitting the bill.
Now that I live with my partner, we split rent, and he might pay some bills and I'll pay others, so its essentially even i. When I was in school, he paid the majority of the bills. When he was in school, I did. I make more money than him, but that doesn't matter to us-we're building a life together, so essentially any money we make is "our" money we still have the freedom to spend our own money on the things we want, but if it's a large purchase, we make the decision about it together.
This has been typical of all my relationships. To answer your questions: Yes, I will date a man who is broke as long as its not simply because he's lazy and won't get a job. Yes, I will date a man who doesn't pay for the dates. And I'm cool if he wants to take me to taco bell-I think it's unreasonable to expect someone to spend more than their means, and if I'm dating someone, it's because I want to spend time with them, not because I want them to take me out to the most expensive places.
As far as sex is concerned, we don't believe that sex is a commody that needs to be earned. We have sex with each other because we want to. We both have healthy sex drives, so we have sex fairly often. I don't "reward" my partner for doing chores around the house-it's OUR home, so we both do the chores that need to be done. I don't withhold sex as a form of "punishment".
Sex is completely separate from those things. I think the reason why a lot of women want to wait a bit before having sex isn't because they want you to pay for or "earn" it, but rather, they don't want to be treated like a prostitute. They want a guy who actually likes them and is interested in a relationship with them, not just taking them on enough dates so that the woman is obliged to have sex with him.
They also realize that, while it's a completely unfair double standard, a lot of guys lose respect for a girl, or decide they only want to have sex with her not a relationship if she has sex with them "too soon. Show All Show Less.
Right away, or if she decides to wait. I understand where you are coming from but I think there are a few things that don't add up to me. So why be upset? In this logic all women want money for sex and all men want to give their money for sex so everyone wins. Dating isn't just used to get sex. It's also used to develop relationships. Meaning the people who are dating don't just want sex. If someone wants just sex they go for just hook ups and hopefully that will only cost you a drink.
Comparing dating and prostitution is like comparing a restaurant making your food to having your mom make your food. Sure you may have to pay more money in the long run for mom like taking care of her when she is older but there are a few things mom has to offer over a restaurant. You can't talk up prostitution as a legitimate thing and then insult people who act like those in the profession. It's like saying slavery is a great thing but then saying child labor is like slavery and it's completely awful.
If prostitution is good, then it's completely OK for anyone to act like a prostitute. Even if she doesn't say she is. You can't have it both ways. You can't say prostitutes are good woman but women that act like them are bad.
Prostitutes aren't humanitarians. They think their John's are morons that they can sexual manipulate. One of my friends grew up in a neighborhood that had lots of prostitutes in it.
He doesn't use prostitutes. He is actually a hopeless romantic who wants love and commitment after growing up seeing what the other option is. You aren't going to see that on some documentary cause they want the John's to come back to the whore house. But prostitutes spend a lot of time laughing at their John's. Prostitutes actually have really, really big mouths no pun intended.
Some of the most shocking stuff I've ever learned was from a girl who was a former prostitute who was talking about her John's. And she wasn't retelling the stories with admiration.
Thedesendent Xper 4. I would date a man who was broke, then again I'd make my own money but even so if I didn't I would as long as I loved him. I think dating is better, emotional connections and friendship bring more into a person's life than just sex.
I mean who the hell feels "refreshed" and altogether "wholesome" after screwing a prostitute? And just for the record, most women don't act like whores.
If anything the men can't stop their raging hormones so much that they go to the whores. Not our problem if you can't get a decent women for real sex. Oh I'm sorry I just read down the comments and realized you're gay. Oh well, my point is that prostitution doesn't really do anything but a moment of pure horny rage, so I vote dating as better even if it isn't statistically more cost effective, then again you'd have to figure how many times you go to a prostitute in a certain amount of time vs in how many times you go out in dating for a complete assessment.
Firstly, I don't think you can seperate "dating" from "relationships", because most normal people date with the intention of getting into a relationship. The shallow, insecure people you're talking about may not be thinking long term, so in their case, yes, a prostitute will probably be better. It really sounds like you're just using this question to spit out a bitter rant against women.
You ask like 3 questions in one. How many women will accept a man that doesn't pay for a date? She wouldn't even hear of me paying, I had to sneak the check to pay when I could. Women "put out" to get men to do chores. No, this is just wrong. Women put out because they enjoy sex just like we do. It's a natural thing - like eating or sleeping, we enjoy those things because they're hard-wired into us. Yes, I know it's shocking to think that women have desires as well, but get over it.
They're human too. What's funny is the first date my girlfriend and I went on was for shakes at Jack in the Box and then a walk in the park.
Mel Greig returns to Tinder after saying the dating app is just 'free prostitution'
What the hell are you driving, an aircraft carrier? Dating is more expensive. Even factoring in driving and what not. Never once.
So, your highly generalized math is rediculous. I've dated girls when I was completely flat broke living at my mom's place and I've dated girls since I've started making cash and I have my own flat. Your argument might be true for you, but for most of the guys I know, they can get dates whether they have a fiver in their pocket or a swimming pool full of cursed gold coins, doesn't matter.
Now you're talking about marriage, not dating, when you specifically said you're talking about dating, not relationships. Stop changing your argument to make your rediculous point. Bottom line, if your goal is just sex, sex, sex, then yes, getting a prostitute or a GFE makes sense.
If your goal is spending time with another human being, regardless of whether you get sex or not, then dating is the answer, cos a prostitute won't give a crap about you other than the money you're throwing at her. You're just as well off buying a blow-up doll - you're basically paying someone to let you use their body to masturbate, that's how much emotional connection you're getting out of it.
More power to you, in that instance. Prostitution is cheeper and girls are more honest about their sexuality. So prostitution is better. Sign Up Now! Sort Girls First Guys First. KarKingJack Xper 2.
This is actually clever. People are hacking it with their emotional prejudice, which you kinda take for granted. But like you keep saying - this isn't relationships vs. But you gotta look at that mathmatically. From a human perspective, you start dating in the hope of finding someone you will fall in love with and so on, fulfilling the inbuilt and unexplained desire to connect completely and permanently with another human, and from the same perspective, you hire a prostitute so you can stick the shaft in her, like, basically.
But from a mathmatical perspective, you aren't focused on an endgoal. Logically, you enter into something - assuming your dating an alltaking woman which is fairly common in America I hear its not really common where I am, though, but that's because no one actually has any money regardless of who they are, you know what I mean? Hahahabecause everythings fairly common in America - in which you have to pay a sum of money, in exhange for some kind of product.
We're not giving that product a name of any kind. Now in dating, many times your left with no product - ie. Or even like, helpful cleaning tips, or an extended television liscence, or anything.
But you've still payed all that money. Now from a human perspective, you expect that. But mathmatically, that's a major WTF. That's a huge risk right there. That's a probably of like 1 or 2, depending on your disposition. That's crazy. However, in prositution, you pay, assuming the afformentioned amounts are correct, about the same. But with prostitution, a product is guaranteed. Mathmatically, that's the more intellegent choice.
Isn't it? Ofcourse we don't date for the same reason we hire out ladiez, but logically that's not assumed.
Money, Female, Product, in this scenario. Orif you wanna go by that rule, but I think that's long dead, ain't it? I'm not really a maths person. Anyway, this jokes. Well done. Oh by the way, on the idea that pimped prostitutes shouldn't be used because they've got terrible lives, that's a bit whacked out an idea. If we're all kindred souls we'd be using them more, I mean if they don't sell they probably get thrashed around, don't they?
Or they don't get their cocaine and get a serious case of the horrors. Its not like if we all decide not to use street harlots they'll all suddenly get better lives, you know? Effectively it'd just add to the unemployment, cost the country more money - assuming this country grants dole - and you'd have hundreds of cracked girls starving on the streets.
But your right, you know, about how scarred those girls are left. I know, like, its wild. Why not just jerk off? Do you have any idea how hungry prostitutes are for business? God blessed you with two hands; use them.
In the grand scheme of things, it's women who have it harder. To the sight of the girl the way he wants her, dressed how he likes her to be, and doing what turns him on. I really don't see how on earth you can come to feel that guys have it worse off. I want you to picture a situation where all the men of the world are inside their homes jerking off when they're horny, and then hanging out with the guys when they're outside their home; or just working or sleeping.
I want you to picture women now, who are trying to find a guy to be in a relationship with. If you're this girl, and you actually come in contract with a guy, do you really think you're going to "not put out" as you call it? You might as well write yourself a prescription for being single. Having sex with the guy you like is the very least you would do.
I'm starting to think that you're either physically deformed, or live in Amish-ville and have posted this through some internet cafe' from your local village. That made me laugh.
I don't see anything wrong with prostitution, if it's 2 adults, who am I to tell them who to sleep with? And there is no game playing so if what you want is just sex at the time, then go for it. Monthly checks don't say much, I mean what if she just had her check up, then caught an std 3 days later and slept with you the next day?
Plus prostitutes sleep with A LOT of men and if you think your chances of getting an std are lowere that's kind of crazy 3. Why do you think only men make the money? And have you ever heard of a pre-nup? Men like you on the other hand who generalize all women and obviously have some mommy issues, please just stick to prostitutes because real women don't want you anyway. I'm not really interested in sex, I just want to hang out with a really cool girl who I have romantic feelings for.
I don't expect her to put out after any date, I think when we are both ready is when she can "put out" but until then being with a pretty girl is enough for me and I have better things to spend money on than sex with someone I don't know or love. I just call them like I see them. And I should care what you think because Straightshooter Xper 4.
Not all girls are about the money. I make more money than my husband and we share everything down to the penny.
So I have 70 bucks and he has 50 bucks; we get 60 bucks each. It's like me giving him 10 extra bucks. I don't feel like I'm losing. I love him. My closest friend dated this guy for years, he has no degree, no money and no full-time job.
She's an IT specialist working at a University. She's still with him and hopelessly in love. I know a few other girls who are still sticking to their high school sweethearts who were "ex-badboy gangsters", but now still live with their mom with no income, no hope for a decent job.